I am not threatened with redundancy by qmul, and in fact my research is quite successful. Apart from not taking a job at queen mary of course. I have, at various times, been asked how i would select candidates for a job, if not by counting papers and impact factors. When the morale of a place falls, and people feel bullied, they will look around for somewhere more pleasant to work, and of course its the best people who will find alternative homes, and leave. In physiology, for example, there are an impact factor greater that seven and three of them are review journals that dont publish original research.
And what are these enhanced thresholds? For research quantity a mere 26 published items with at least 11 as significant author (no distinction between academic level) research quality a modest 6 items published in numerically-favoured journals (e Buy now Writing a scientific paper for publication London
In that decade ideas were brewing and kant was agonising over them as he saw them as vitally important to human life, both intellectual and otherwise. Needless to say, the significance of his work was not immediately felt. To survive, staff must meet the minimum threshold in three out of the four categories, except as follows demonstration of activity at an exceptional level in either research outputs or research income, termed an enhanced threshold, is sufficient to justify selection regardless of levels of activity in the other two categories. In 1991 sakmann, with erwin neher, got the nobel prize for physiology or medicine. It certainly shows that im not making a fuss about nothing.
A university should be proud that some research lines stop because the ideas failed Writing a scientific paper for publication London Buy now
We are lucky to have those qualities in abundance among our staff is correct. A department has to achieve a high account of if, elsewise the head of the departments receives no bonus at the end of the year. Richard horton, in the , who used the nuremburg defence, pointing out that the dean (tom macdonald) was just obeying orders from above. Hell, did i read them all at least ? No, i cannot even say i read all of them perhaps i read a third. Its a method that i learned a long time ago from stephen heinemann, a senior scientist at the salk institute.
It seems that the ref is paying attention to the science not to bibliometricians. Of course qmul will get applications, but they wont get the best people if they treat them as they seem to have been doing Buy Writing a scientific paper for publication London at a discount
Richard horton, in the , who used the nuremburg defence, pointing out that the dean (tom macdonald) was just obeying orders from above. People are being told to pack their bags and move out with one days notice. Far from being gaussian, it is even more skewed than a geometric distribution the mean number of citations is 114, but 69 of papers have fewer than the mean, and 24 have fewer than 30 citations. One paper has 2,364 citations but 35 have 10 or fewer. We now learn that, following the precedent set by queen mary, university of london, dr ohm could be found guilty of gross misconduct and face disciplinary proceedings leading to dismissal for having the effrontery to raise such issues in a public place Buy Online Writing a scientific paper for publication London
The numbers refer to the four year period from 2008 to 2011. In the face of such a boneheaded approach to assessment of your worth, its the duty of any responsible academic to point out the harm thats being done to the college. Dr missirlis believes all of his 6 papers to be of high quality dr missirlis also argued that he cannot be assessed by a non-expert. Currently, the management rejects the union plan as a recipe for mediocrity, and is moving to the next stage of its own agenda, which is to hire in new staff with ref-returnable credentials. The damage is high for the reputation of the university, the work groups around him and the surgeon himself, who lost his job immediately.
Too many are modest achievers, retired from their own studies, intoxicated with jargon, delusional about corporate status and forever banging the metrics gong Buy Writing a scientific paper for publication London Online at a discount
One aim of this is to find out how much the candidate understands the principles of what they are doing, as opposed to following a recipe. You may want to join the many people who have already written to qmuls principal, simon gaskell (. Unless, of course, qmul wishes to encourage corrupt practice in order to increase their income. Needless to say, the significance of his work was not immediately felt. Yes, i absolutely agree that solely counting papers is a poor way of assessing academic abilityachievement as you say, blanket metrics like the qmul ones work just as badly for particle physics as they do in other fields of science.
Thus it was only to be expected that we would seek to emulate its espousal of draconian censorship Writing a scientific paper for publication London For Sale
Peter higgs had no papers at all from the time he moved to edinburgh in 1960, until 1964 when his two papers on whats now called the higgs boson were published in. Well, i dont know what goes on at your place, but at mine we have always thought, when making appointments, that its important enough to expend thought, careful consideration, and i guess everyone knows that, however hard you try you have to accept that you cannot predict the future. To support the case for more undergraduates, the college produced new estimates of studentstaff ratios, revised downwards and therefore just falling within the range of ssrs in existing equivalent russell group departments. But whats particularly stupid about qmuls behaviour is the way they are going about it For Sale Writing a scientific paper for publication London
Qm senior management are completely deluding themselves if they think that any successful academic researcher would willingly move to an institution that functions in this way. Hell, did i read them all at least ? No, i cannot even say i read all of them perhaps i read a third. The demand to have two papers in journals with impact factor greater than seven is nonsense. I have personally experienced those reviews from demanding one or two more final experiments that will clinch the publication. Thus it was only to be expected that we would seek to emulate its espousal of draconian censorship.
Alternatively you can buy your survival with a total research income of 1,000,000 as pi. Others have written more succinctly about the crass stupidity of your human resources department than i could, and their apparent ignorance of how science actually works Sale Writing a scientific paper for publication London